Home >> Office Electronics >> Calculators Home >> Office Electronics
HP 33S Scientific Calculator (F2216A) | List Price: $50.99 Discount Price: $35.00

| Brand: Hewlett-Packard Binding: Electronics
Features: - RPN and algebraic key-in logic
- Easy-to-read 2-line LCD
- Sturdy rubber/plastic construction
- 32 KB memory, 27 memory storage and recall functions
- Automatic power off
Poor display 2.22 = 222 [Posted on 2008-02-07] I really wanted to like this calculator, but the display is a dealbreaker. 2.2222 looks like 22222 with a tiny little speck between the first two numbers. I use my calculators in a busy, dirty, dusty environment with variable lighting, and I simply can't easily see the decimal on this one.
The styling is a little bit radical but I like it when designers take risks and so I'm not counting it against. The rubber sides are a good feature, and the case and the manual are nice.
Another thing, the batteries were relatively low when I bought the calculator. I had to replace them after one year of very light use.
I'm an HP fan but I really can't say too much nice about this calculator because I was only ever able to use it at my desk when I had nice conditions to really inspect the display every time I made a calculation. The programming is fun and I think the R/S key is better placed than on the HP 35s. I also think the 33s has a slight speed edge with the processor. I haven't run any formal tests to confirm this but the 33 feels snappier to me than the 35.
Good work...but doesn't live up to older technology? [Posted on 2008-02-28] First of all, I've used an HP for nearly 10 years, starting with the HP 32SII. However, as a 32SII is harder and harder to find these days, I picked up one of these when they came out a couple years back. I've been fairly pleased with it, but wish I could mesh the 33s and 32sII together.
Some pros/cons:
* The 33s keyboard feels slightly awkward. Not truly bad, but ENTER could be bigger, as you are going to be pushing it a lot. It also seems like you'll push a button at an odd angle and not have it register (probably user error :P).
* The solver works well, and the stored constants are brilliant when doing coursework.
* As many other users have stated, the stack should be much larger - 8 would be great (at least 6 would be nice).
* Being able to switch to Algebraic entry is nice in order to be able to loan out the calculator every once in a while.
* Two display levels is REALLY nice, just in case you forget whats on the stack.
* Finally, the batteries are quite expensive, all things considered. It doesn't eat through them or anything, it simply runs you an extra ~$10 every year and a half or so.
Even with all the bad (certainly not terrible), this is still one of the best calculators I have ever used. Heres to hoping HP keeps improving on the design.
HP 33S works fine, lots of function [Posted on 2008-03-30] this is not your regular TI or Casio calculator. It is meant to be non graphical and multi function calculator. I bought it for my FE exam in April, 08.
This calculator comes with somany buit-in functions. Each button has atleast three functions to it. The instruction manual was very rich with content and dense. However, because it comes with so many functions, good luck figuring it all out. it can be confusing to find the keys you need. its also programmable which is what I look for in a calculator. However, programing is tedious and tormenting. Have fun!
Not your Dad's HP [Posted on 2008-04-05] I already own two previous HP models including the 15c and 41CX, both of which have served me well for many years. The trouble is that neither has been approved by NCEES for use during the FE exam. Consequently, I was compelled to buy a Model 33s in order to sit for the Exam in 2006. The first problem I noticed was the cheap feel of the keys. When using the calculator with any "speed" it became difficult to ascertain whether or not a keystroke had actually registered; necessitating a s-l-o-w and deliberate approach to data entry.
Another fatal flaw is found in the LCD display, as the decimal can be camouflaged, especially when preceded by the number "2" (but hey, what's an order of magnitude or two between friends?...).
The 33s also offers an option to use RPN...or not. Is RPN not the primary distinction that has set HP calculators ahead of all other competing brands? The analogy of the "Enduro" comes to mind - A motorcycle that can be operated on the highway, or in the dirt, yet not very well on either surface. Get with it HP, RPN is why we buy.
In brief, the HP 33s does not live up to the standards of functionality that HP had so brilliantly established over the past several decades. The 33s is a dissapointment for this long-time user of HP calculators, yet was a "necessary evil" with respect to the FE Exam. Fortunately there is a new HP model (HP 35s) approved by NCEES for those RPN junkies taking the exam this year. Hopefully that model will live up to the quality expectations of die-hard RPN users.
Serves the purpose...no other choice [Posted on 2008-05-03] Well, what can I say. For the Professional Engineers exam there are no other choices in HP calculator models, either this or the 35s. This one was useful for studying and during the exam.
PROS: Manual comes with several programs that you can use to ease calculations, like Matrix solving and TVM calculations. Its helpful that one can switch from RPN to algebraic so you can use the same calculator for people that are not familiar with RPN (or dont care for it).
CONS: When programming, you cant use the same variable names across different separate programs, since the memory seems to be just one lump piece, which made me have to reassign variable names so I could have different programs installed. The clicking of the keys is also a bit annoying, specially during the exam. You're in enough tension as it is, to have someone next to you clicking away.
Click here for more details and discount information...
|