Steel Beasts

Discount Price: $23.95

Accessories:

PC Gamer (1-year)

Customer Reviews:

Steel Beasts is a "real" tank simulator [Posted on 2001-11-03]
As the title shows Steel Beasts is based on real tank tactics. I thought some of the other tank simulators where good, until I picked this on up. Yeah so the graphics might not be good right now, but the realizm sure makes up for it. Take it from someone who used to be on an M1A1, during Desert Storm, this game rocks, brought back some memories.
You can even make up your own missions, use the missions that come with the game, and play them against real people over the internet.
So if you want to see what it is like to be inside an M1A1, during the heat of a battle, "minus the closed in feeling, lol" then this game is for you.

Not just good... [Posted on 2001-11-03]
There are countries that use this "game" as a cheap simulator for their militaries, The Deutch and the USofA just to name two.
If that isn't a compelling reason to buy this game then I don't know what is.
;)

A perfect simulation [Posted on 2002-02-22]
As a Swiss tank commander, I was very happy to find a Leopard II simulation. And everything is just so realistic! Ok, the graphics are a bit old but all the details are respected, the sounds are so real and the AI is impressive. It's never been so close to reality so I recommend it to tank lovers only. Other people might not see the perfection of this "game".

Steel Beasts by Strategy First [Posted on 2003-06-19]
Pathetically boring and graphics more than dissapointing. Is not recommended in the slightest due to, lack of graphic detail, inability to be more than two types of AFVs, uncoordinated missions, unrealistic sequences and poor settings. Definatley deserves its one star rating.

True to Life Representation Flawed By Scenarios [Posted on 2004-05-10]
This game is a masterpiece of modern armor simulation put together by actual tankers which simulates the real thing.

It is realistic and it is used a simulator in the Army. The tactics are real, the physics are real, the sounds are real and even the gun sights are real!

Ok, so the suspension stays stationary and your troops don't have faces on them (big deal!). The game simulates the condition of battle, not paltry details. It is not a role-playing game.

I take my hat off to the people that put this together.

But I do have some critiques...

The scenarios require you to kill EVERY SINGLE LIVING THING inside a given objective zone to be declared a winner, otherwise you might suffer a MAJOR DEFEAT. Give me a break guys! If you have masses of your vehicles inside the objective, you are a winner. If the area in front of you is littered with enemy wrecks and you are holding your position, you are a winner, okay?!!

Also, you are given a very short time to gain your objective. This comes from the Blitzkrieg, gung-ho, jet pilot mentality so prevalent both inside and outside of the military nowadays. You are expected to advance quickly upon the enemy and gain your objective or you are considered ineffective.

Everytime I met the scenario time requirements, I ended up losing half of my force, which I would not call a successful MAJOR VICTORY by any means. An M-1 costs $4 million and experienced veteran crews are priceless, so no, NOT a MAJOR VICTORY.

Real tank battles are not as exciting or as fast moving as some of the scenario writers would have us believe. They involve of a lot of movement by advancing carefully from cover to cover, then creeping out to engage the enemy.

If it is the flashy, move quick, blitz attack this simulation is drumming into the heads of those drilling on it, then get ready for some heavy casualties on the real battlefield!

Last but not least (as players might have noticed) the artillery is a major headache.

Tank formations get decimated by artillery in this game.

The sound of artillery falling on my company pretty much signals the end of the scenario because it knocks out your tanks' 'gadgets' (thermal sights, computers, laser rangefinders, stabilized sightes,) without which I might as well be attacking with a platoon of Shermans!

I dunno, but I would think all that sophisticated stuff would be protected by armor.

Granted, its supposed to be the new advanced artillery which is composed of bomblets, heat-seeking grenades and such, but still, if you think an armored division has enough supply tail to be dragging tons of this artillery ammunition around, you have a fantasy concept of war.

And the enemy artillery is as good as US artillery (I guess we lost the technical race after all!)

So what you have are tank formations just wallopping themselves into mush with artillery (APCs are immediately destroyed by it).

I can see the 'heads-up' the designers are giving by including this new tank-busting super artillery, but the truth of the matter is that it won't be as widely available as the game represents (we would run out of it).

The only way you can avoid artillery is to keep moving (which is sometimes not wise in the face of the enemy) or spread your tanks out so wide they can no longer be controlled as formations.

A valid point guys, but how about granting the player some super-spread out formations so he can counter the artillery barrages?

In summary, I must just say it is a stupendous simulation which is a bit flawed on the victory conditions and on its dependence on omnipotent artillery.

If you want to know what a tank battle is like, however, plug in your helmet and hang on!

This is the real stuff!

Click here for more details and discount information...